Submission Guidelines

Ensure your submission meets the standard—start with the official Guidlines.

Proceeding and Submission

Learn more about our ethics, editorial responsibilities, and peer review process

Guidelines

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this proceeding. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Conference Proceedings Submission Preparation Checklist

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Copyright Notice

ISAIME 2025 by BKS-TM Indonesia is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this proceeding site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this proceeding and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Publication Ethics

Ethical policies for maintaining academic integrity

The ISAIME is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics, ensuring every published manuscript's integrity, originality, and quality. We follow COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and require that all submitted papers must be first presented at the ISAIME conference before being considered for publication.

Responsibilities of Authors

Originality and Plagiarism
  • Manuscripts must be original and unpublished elsewhere.
  • All forms of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, are prohibited.
Authorship
  • Only contributors to the research and writing should be listed as authors.
  • All authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.
Research Integrity
  • Research must be reported accurately without manipulation or falsification.
  • Proper citation of data sources and methods is mandatory.
Conflict of Interest
  • All financial or personal conflicts must be disclosed.
Presentation Requirement
  • All manuscripts must have been presented at the ISAIME conference.
  • Authors must provide proof of presentation during submission.

Responsibilities of Editors

Publication Decisions

Editors make decisions based on merit and peer-review results.

Confidentiality

Editors maintain the confidentiality of all submissions.

Fair Assessment

Decisions must be unbiased and based on quality and relevance.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Objectivity & Feedback

Reviewers should provide helpful and constructive feedback.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts must be kept confidential during review.

Ethical Concerns

Reviewers must report suspected plagiarism or ethical violations.

Sanctions for Ethical Violations

Violations such as plagiarism, data falsification, or failure to present at ISAIME may result in manuscript rejection, retraction, or a ban from future submissions.

ISAIME is committed to maintaining the highest standards to support the integrity of mechanical engineering research.

Peer Review Policy

Maintaining quality through rigorous academic review

Process Overview

All manuscripts go through initial screening followed by a double-blind review by at least two experts. The editorial board makes final decisions based on reviewers’ feedback.

Evaluation Criteria

  • Originality: Novel contribution to mechanical/industrial engineering.
  • Scientific Quality: Valid methods and data interpretation.
  • Relevance: Fit with ISAIME scope and real-world impact.
  • Clarity: Well-structured, technically sound writing.
  • Ethics: No plagiarism or ethical violations.

Timeline & Revisions

Reviews are typically completed within 2–4 weeks. Authors must submit revisions by the deadline. Revisions may undergo re-review before final acceptance.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts and reviews are treated as confidential. Reviewers must not share or misuse any content.

Final Decision

The editorial board makes the final decision. Accepted papers must be presented at ISAIME before publication.

This process ensures that all papers meet high academic and ethical standards and contribute meaningful advancements in the field.